Introduction
As a fan and disciple of The American Cinema: Directors and Directions, 1929 - 1968, Andrew Sarris’s standard anatomization of Hollywood directors, I return to it again and again for insight and succor. Unfortunately, the book has a cut off date of 1968, consequently containing no rankings and summaries for Martin Scorsese, Oliver Stone, Terrence Malick, and scores of other directors who emerged since Sarris’s book came out.
Modestly, I hope to rectify that situation. Over the next several months, I propose to issue forth brand new director summaries and evaluations, geared for adaptability into Sarris’s template. With a slight refiguring of Sarris’s categories, these new director filmographies and summaries should slip easily into Sarris’s book, physically, though perhaps not aesthetically. In Sarris’s book, the titles were in plain text, with key films of a director’s oeuvre in italics; here all titles are in italics, with key films also in bold; I’m sure that Sarris would do it that way, too, if he were writing the book today. My slightly refined categories will be, in ranking order, Future Pantheon, The Near Side of Paradise, Lightly Likable, Working Stiffs, Cable Ready, Send in the Clowns, Foreign Trade, Producers as Auteurs, Actors Turned Directors, Strained Seriousness, More Less Than Meets the Eye, The Writers, Flashes in the Pan, and finally, Subjects for Further Research. Rankings are tentative, for the most part, because these are living directors whose full careers may eventually modify their final rankings. Fellow fans of American Cinema are encouraged to print out this dispatches and paste them into a scrapbook that can sit on the shelf next to Sarris’s book.
—————————————————————————
Francis Ford Coppola (1939 -)
Ranking: Future Pantheon

Battle Beyond the Sun (as Thomas Colchart, of new footage, 1960); The Bellboy and the Playgirls (also writer, 1962); Tonight for Sure (also writer, 1962); The Haunted Palace (writer only, 1963); The Terror (uncredited, 1963); Dementia 13 (also writer, 1963); This Property Is Condemned (writer only, 1966); Is Paris Burning? (writer only, 1966); You’re a Big Boy Now (also writer, 1966); Finian’s Rainbow (1968); The Rain People (also writer, 1969); Patton (writer only, 1970); The Godfather (also writer, 1972); The Great Gatsby (writer only, 1974); The Conversation (also writer, 1974); The Godfather: Part II (also writer, 1974); The Godfather Saga (also writer, 1977 TV mini-series); Apocalypse Now (also writer, 1979); One from the Heart (also writer, 1982); The Outsiders (1983); Rumble Fish (also writer, 1983); The Cotton Club (1984); Captain EO (also writer, 1986 music video); Peggy Sue Got Married (1986); “Rip Van Winkle” episode of Shelley Duvall’s Faerie Tale Theatre (1987); Gardens of Stone (1987); Tucker: The Man and His Dream (1988); “Life without Zoe” segment of New York Stories (also writer, 1989); The Godfather: Part III (also writer, 1990); Making “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” (1992, TV documentary); The Godfather Trilogy: 1901-1980 (also writer, 1992 video); Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992); Jack (1996); The Rainmaker (also writer, 1997); Supernova (uncredited reshoots, 2000); Youth Without Youth (also writer, 2007); Tetro (also writer, 2009).

There are two Francis Ford Coppolas, and they even have two different names. As Francis Ford Coppola he is the towering figure from among the so-called movie brats, filmmakers who emerged in the late 1960s. In fact, Coppola was there first, and even cleared a path for some of his successors, starting with George Lucas. As Francis Coppola, temporarily shorn of his middle name, he was a gun for hire throughout the 1980s, lurching from one career-saving payday to another (though the two names and roles sometimes overlap their functions). But then Coppola has also been of two minds about the movie industry and the studio system. He was the first movie brat to make a film within the even-then crumbling walls of the otherwise exclusive studio system, i.e., the musical Finian’s Rainbow ; but as was often the case with Coppola in those days, he followed that film immediately with The Rain People , a Cassavetes-style tale of marital disharmony set on the road and focusing on a woman in a troubled marriage. It was as if Coppola could only stand to be in the studio system so long before he had to cleanse himself of its muck and undergo a purifying process of harsh location shooting far from the prying eyes of executives, films that were generally financed daringly on his own. Like Woody Allen, after a string of masterpieces he had a dark decade of work which never seemed to meet the approval of critics or match the heights he had reached earlier (he was also the first brat packer to win an Oscar, for the script of Patton ). Like Spielberg, he also became a prolific producer, but without the ease or consilience with the studio chiefs that Spielberg enjoyed. Coppola was always just outside the studio gates, at UCLA, or in Napa Valley, or on the road across America, or off in the Philippines going crazy.

The overarching theme of Coppola’s films concerns a determined person who wants to free his or herself from the family, from the tribe, from society, from responsibility. Thus Natalie Ravenna of The Rain People, engaged in a crazy feminist flight from her husband, mirrors Michael Corleone in The Godfather , who desires to eschew the family business but ultimately can’t resist the fact that, unlike his brothers, he is a natural for it. He in turn anticipates Frannie in One from the Heart. Colonel Walter E. Kurtz has dropped out of family and society to fight a pure war; Peggy Sue wants to re-live her life with different decisions. Even Jack bristles under the turmoil of his ludicrous and sentimental situation. But just as Coppola’s visual technique alternates between the “classicism” of old Hollywood (added to the poise of European cinema) and the “authenticity” of close-to-the-action, light weight technology, the overriding text of his tales alternates between thinly disguised autobiographical stories ( You’re a Big Boy Now ) and allegories for his attitude toward and battles with the studios he is so drawn to and repelled by ( Tucker: The Man and His Dream ).
Coppola is that rare commercial director who deals in ideas. Apocalypse Now is as cold in its questioning of war in general as it is sensual in its depiction of it, just as Patton explored the ambiguity of the war lord psychology. There is a real question of family ethics and succession at the heart of The Godfather series, and The Conversation challenges our (then) ideas about privacy and the use of technology.

Youth Without Youth , in its exploration of European philosophical ideas about time and aging may represent yet a new direction for the director, who made the film when he was 67 after a 10-year hiatus from helming. Based on a novella by Romanian writer Mircea Eliade, Youth Without Youth is a distant cousin to Jack as it follows an aged intellectual (Tim Roth) near death who, in the late 1930s, experiences an inexplicable reversion to an earlier physical age, allowing him additional years in which to live through WWII, and well into the 1950s, while also re-igniting an old love affair though a contemporary surrogate and finishing his once-stalled life work. Though sometimes confusing and always sweeping in its historical gaze, the film seems surprisingly autobiographical, an old man’s meditation on aging and death, and on a life in which projects get left unfinished, as so many of Coppola’s have been.
Youth Without Youth may not fully “work” as a commercial film, but it is a fascinating departure from the director’s usual track. But that is to be expected from a director with a robust appetite for films as vehicles for ideas and observations of lived life. If some of Coppola’s work-for-hire films failed to live up to his ferocious talent, those projects in which it gains full sway are among the greatest films ever made.